John Dewey as critical philosopher (C. Wright Mills, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse) [[electronic resource]]
Hit：159
Rating：0
Review：0
Trackback：0
Forward：0
001
65424
003
ChTaNC
007
008
090417s2004 xxu e eng d
020
|a0496745093
035
|a(UnM)AAI3127245
035
|aAAI3127245
040
|aTMUE|beng|cTMUE|dTMUE
066
|c$1
100
1
|aFitzsimmonsMatthew J
245
10
|aJohn Dewey as critical philosopher (C. Wright Mills, Erich Fromm, Herbert Marcuse)|h[[electronic resource]]
260
|aAnn Arbor, Mich : |bUMI, |c2004
300
|a182 p
500
|aSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-03, Section: A, page: 0961
500
|aDirector: John Lachs
500
|aSchool code: 0242
502
|aThesis (Ph.D.)--Vanderbilt University, 2004
520
|aThis study addresses the criticisms leveled at John Dewey by four critical thinkers: Max Horkheimer, C. Wright Mills, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse. I approach these thinkers from the standpoint of defending Dewey. Essentially their criticisms fall into two groups: (1) they are either weak claims, attributing to Dewey ideas/positions that he does not hold, or (2) they are inappropriate claims, attacking Dewey for lacking ideas or not taking positions that he in fact has and takes. In the responses to these objections, the critical nature of Dewey's work becomes evident and the ways in which his positions move beyond the various limitations of the critics are made readily apparent. By answering the criticisms, I put to rest several misconceptions
Check-outs
: 
Hit：159
Rating：0
Review：0
Trackback：0
